Skip to main content

When installing synthetic grass, choosing the right infill is a crucial decision that impacts your artificial turf’s performance, longevity, and safety. Two of the most common infill options are silica sand and Envirofill. While both serve as effective stabilizers, they have distinct differences that make one more suitable than the other depending on your needs. In this guide, we’ll compare silica sand vs. Envirofill for synthetic grass to help you make an informed decision.

What is Silica Sand?

Silica sand is a naturally occurring granular material composed of quartz. It is widely used as an infill due to its affordability and availability. Silica sand is spread over synthetic grass to help blades stand upright, improve drainage, and add stability to the turf.

Pros of Silica Sand:

  • Cost-Effective: Silica sand is one of the most budget-friendly infill options available.
  • Readily Available: It is widely accessible and easy to install.
  • Basic Stabilization: Provides the necessary weight and support to maintain the structure of synthetic turf.

Cons of Silica Sand:

  • Dust and Compaction: Over time, silica sand can compact, reducing drainage efficiency and causing hard spots.
  • Potential Health Concerns: Silica dust, if inhaled in large quantities, can pose respiratory risks.
  • Limited Antimicrobial Properties: Does not prevent bacteria, mold, or mildew growth, potentially leading to odors and hygiene concerns.
  • Heat Retention: Absorbs heat, making the surface hotter under direct sunlight.

What is Envirofill?

Envirofill is a coated, non-toxic, round sand infill designed to offer improved performance and safety for synthetic grass installations. It features Microban® antimicrobial protection, which helps prevent bacteria and odors.

Pros of Envirofill:

  • Antimicrobial Protection: Microban® technology helps inhibit bacteria, mold, and mildew growth, making it a cleaner and more hygienic option.
  • Long-Lasting & Reusable: Unlike silica sand, Envirofill does not degrade or compact over time and can be reused if the turf is replaced.
  • Low Dust and Non-Toxic: Contains minimal dust particles, making it a safer choice for children and pets.
  • Cooler Surface Temperature: Does not retain as much heat as silica sand, providing a more comfortable playing surface.
  • Improved Drainage: Due to its round, uniform shape, Envirofill promotes better drainage and prevents compaction.

Cons of Envirofill:

  • Higher Cost: Envirofill is more expensive than silica sand, which may not be ideal for budget-conscious projects.
  • Availability: May not be as widely available as silica sand in some regions.

Which One is Right for You?

Choosing between silica sand and Envirofill depends on your specific needs and budget:

  • Budget-Friendly Projects: If cost is a primary concern, silica sand is an economical option.
  • Pet Owners & High-Traffic Areas: Envirofill is the better choice for pet-friendly installations and areas with high foot traffic due to its antimicrobial and non-compacting properties.
  • Long-Term Investment: If you’re looking for a long-lasting, low-maintenance solution, Envirofill offers superior performance and reusability.
  • Cooler Turf Surface: Envirofill is the better choice in warmer climates where heat retention is a concern.

Final Thoughts

Both silica sand and Envirofill have their place in synthetic grass installations, but the best choice depends on your priorities. If you’re looking for a cost-effective option with basic stabilization, silica sand may suffice. However, if you prioritize longevity, cleanliness, and safety—especially in pet and child-friendly environments—Envirofill is the superior choice.

By understanding the pros and cons of each infill, you can select the best option for your artificial turf project and enjoy a beautiful, durable lawn for years to come!

Close Menu

In Greater Phoenix area and need turf?

Let us know how we can assist!

Contact Us